INTERNATIONAL PRESS FREEDOM INDEX 2008

By Reporters Without Borders
OCTOBER 22, 2008

ONLY PEACE PROTECTS FREEDOMS IN POST 9/11 WORLD

Some African leaders have understood the advantages their countries could
derive from press freedom. Others have behaved like despots again this
year. The continent's best-placed countries continue by and large to be
the
same, with Namibia (23rd), Mali (31st), Cape Verde (36th) and Mauritius
(47th) coming in the top 50. Some countries that were sorely tried by
years
of war or dictatorship are emerging from the depths to which they were
plunged by violence. They include Liberia (51st), where some police
officers still behave with deplorable brutality, and Togo (53rd), which
is
managing to adhere to acceptable democratic standards.

In democracies such as Botswana (66th) and Benin (70th), the climate
between the government and the press often deteriorates, preventing these
countries from attaining the positions they would otherwise deserve,
given
their overall political situation.

Senegal (86th) has fallen again in the ranking because of the
government's
stubborn refusal to amend the press law and the often outrageous
behaviour
of some of Dakar's newspapers. Senegalese journalists were imprisoned
again
this year. The bad surprise came from Mauritania (105th), where
legislative
reforms were clearly inadequate and the political culture continues to be
marked by former President Ould Taya's police-state practices.

There is no point in having a diverse and often insolent press unless you
tolerate it without resorting to the security forces or an easily
influenced legal system. In Central African Republic (85th), Burundi
(94th)
and Guinea (99th), for example, the least political unrest can send
journalists to prison or at least the police station.

This year's black spots in Africa were Kenya (97th), which fell 19 places
as a result of post-electoral violence, and above all Niger (130th),
which
fell 41 places after a very trying year for journalists in Niamey and
elsewhere. Reporting on the Tuareg uprising in the north of the country
has
become an absolute taboo for the government, especially in the run-up to
the 2009 presidential election.

The African countries near the bottom of the ranking are also the same
ones
as usual. They include Gambia (137th), Democratic Republic of Congo
(148th)
and Zimbabwe (151st), where independent journalism requires courage,
determination and an ability to put up with violence and injustice.

Finally, the gigantic posters to the glory of President Teodoro Obiang
Nguema throughout "Africa's Kuwait" say it all about the media
situation in
Equatorial Guinea (156th). But the continent's most abused country is yet
again Eritrea (173rd), last in the ranking for the second year running.
President Issaias Afeworki clings to his deliberate choice of cruelty to
the many journalists held incommunicado since 2001, and despotism as his
method of governing a country whose citizens continue to flee into
exile."

Democracies embroiled in wars outside their own territory, such as the
United States or Israel, fall further in the ranking every year while
several emerging countries, especially in Africa and the Caribbean, give
better and better guarantees for media freedom.

It is not economic prosperity but peace that guarantees press freedom.
That is the main lesson to be drawn from the world press freedom index that
Reporters Without Borders compiles every year and from the 2008 edition,
released today. Another conclusion from the index - in which the bottom
three rungs are again occupied by the "infernal trio" of
Turkmenistan(171st), North Korea (172nd) and Eritrea (173rd) - is that the international community's conduct towards authoritarian regimes such as
Cuba (169th) and China (167th) is not effective enough to yield results.

"The post-9/11 world is now clearly drawn," Reporters Without Borders
said."Destabilised and on the defensive, the leading democracies are gradually
eroding the space for freedoms. The economically most powerful
dictatorships arrogantly proclaim their authoritarianism, exploiting the
international community's divisions and the ravages of the wars carried
outin the name of the fight against terrorism. Religious and political
taboos are taking greater hold by the year in countries that used to be
advancing down the road of freedom."

"The world's closed countries, governed by the worst press freedom
predators, continue to muzzle their media at will, with complete
impunity,while organisations such as the UN lose all authority over their
members,"Reporters Without Borders added. "In contrast with this generalised
decline, there are economically weak countries that nonetheless guarantee
their population the right to disagree with the government and to say so
publicly."

War and peace

Two aspects stand out in the index, which covers the 12 months to 1
September 2008. One is Europe's preeminence. Aside from New Zealand and
Canada, the first 20 positions are held by European countries. The other
is the very respectable ranking achieved by certain Central American and
Caribbean countries. Jamaica and Costa Rica are in 21st and 22nd
positions,rubbing shoulders with Hungary (23rd). Just a few position below them are
Surinam (26th) and Trinidad and Tobago (27th). These small Caribbean
countries have done much better than France (35th), which has fallen
again this year, this time by four places, and Spain (36th) and Italy (44th),
countries held back again by political or mafia violence. Namibia (23rd),
alarge and now peaceful southern African country that came first in
Africa,ahead of Ghana (31st), was just one point short of joining the top 20.

The economic disparities among the top 20 are immense. Iceland's per
capita GDP is 10 times Jamaica's. What they have in common is a parliamentary
democratic system, and not being involved in any war.

This is not the case with the United States (36th domestically and 119th
outside its own territory) and Israel (46th domestically and 149th
outside its own territory), whose armed forces killed a Palestinian journalist
for the first time since 2003. A resumption of fighting also affected Georgia
(120th) and Niger, which fell sharply from 95th in 2007 to 130th this
year.

Although they have democratic political systems, these countries are
embroiled in low or high intensity conflicts and their journalists,
exposed to the dangers of combat or repression, are easy prey. The recent
provisional release of Moussa Kaka, the Niger correspondent of RFI and
Reporters Without Borders, after 384 days in prison in Niamey and
cameraman Sami al-Haj's release after six years in the hell of Guantanamo serve as reminders that wars sweep away not only lives but also, and above all,freedom.

Under fire from belligerents or intrusive governments

Countries that have become embroiled in very violent conflicts after
failing to resolve serious political problems, such as Iraq (158th),
Pakistan (152nd), Afghanistan (156th) and Somalia (153rd), continue to be
highly dangerous "black zones" for the press, places where
journalists are targets for murder, kidnapping, arbitrary arrest or death threats everyday. They may come under fire from the parties at war. They may be
accused of taking sides. Any excuse will do to get rid of "trouble-makers"
and "spies." Such is the case in the Palestinian Territories (163rd),
especially the Gaza Strip, where the situation got much worse after Hamas
seized power. At the same time, in Sri Lanka (165th), where there is an
elected government, the press has to face violence that is only too often
organised by the state.

Bringing up the rear are the dictatorships - some disguised, some not -
where dissidents and pro-reform journalists manage to open cracks in the
walls that enclose them. The year of the Olympics in the new Asian power,
China (167th), was the year that Hu Jia and many other dissidents and
journalists were jailed. But it also provided opportunities to those
liberal media that are trying gradually to free themselves of the
country's still pervasive police control. Being a journalist in Beijing or Shanghai
or in Iran (166th), Uzbekistan (162nd) and Zimbabwe (151st) - is a high
risk exercise involving endless frustration and constant police and
judicial harassment. In Burma (170th), run by a xenophobic and inflexible
junta, journalists and intellectuals, even foreign ones, have for years
been viewed as enemies by the regime, and they pay the price.

Unchanging hells

In Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali's Tunisia (143rd), Muammar Gaddafi's Libya
(160rd), Alexander Lukashenko's Belarus (154th), Bashar el-Assad's
Syria(159e) and Teodoro Obiang Nguema's Equatorial Guinea (156th), the
leader's ubiquitous portrait on the streets and front pages of the newspapers is
enough to dispel any doubt about the lack of press freedom. Other
dictatorships do without a personality cult but are just as suffocating.
Nothing is possible in Laos (164th) or Saudi Arabia (161st) if it does not accord with government policy.

Finally, North Korea and Turkmenistan are unchanging hells in which the
population is cut off from the world and is subjected to propaganda
worthy of a bygone age. And in Eritrea (173rd), which has come last for the
second year running, President Issaias Afeworki and his small clan of paranoid
nationalists continue to run Africa's youngest country like a vast open
prison.

The international community, including the European Union, endlessly
repeats that the only solution continues to be "dialogue." But
dialogue has clearly had little success and even the most authoritarian governments
are still able to ignore remonstrations without risking any repercussions
other than the inconsequential displeasure of the occasional diplomat.

Dangers of corruption and political hatred

The other disease that eats away at democracies and makes them lose
ground in the ranking is corruption. The bad example of Bulgaria (59th), still
last in Europe, serves as a reminder that universal suffrage, media
pluralism and some constitutional guarantees are not enough to ensure
effective press freedom. The climate must also favour the flow of
information and expression of opinions. The social and political tensions
in Peru (108th) and Kenya (97th), the media politicisation in Madagascar
(94th) and Bolivia (115th) and the violence against investigative
journalists in Brazil (82nd) are all examples of the kinds of poison that
blight emerging democracies. And the existence of people who break the
law to get rich and who punish inquisitive journalists with impunity is a
scourge that keeps several "great countries" - such as Nigeria
(131st),Mexico (140th) and India (118th) - in shameful positions.

Certain would-be "great countries" deliberately behave in a manner
that is brutal, unfair or just disturbing. The examples include Venezuela
(113th),where President Hugo Chávez's personality and decrees are often crushing,
and the Putin-Medvedev duo's Russia (141st), where state and opposition
media are strictly controlled and journalists such as Anna Politkovskaya
are killed each year by "unidentified" gunmen who often turn out to
have close links with the Kremlin's security services.

Resisting the taboos

The ranking's "soft underbelly" also includes countries that
waver between repression and liberalisation, where the taboos are still inviolable and
the press laws hark back to another era. In Gabon (110th), Cameroon
(129th), Morocco (122nd), Oman (123rd), Cambodia (126th), Jordan (128th)
and Malaysia (132nd), for example, it is strictly forbidden to report
anything that reflects badly on the president or monarch, or their family
and close associates. Journalists are routinely sent to prison in Senegal
(86th) and Algeria (121st) under repressive legislation that violates the
democratic standards advocated by the UN.

Online repression also exposes these tenacious taboos. In Egypt (146th),
demonstrations launched online shook the capital and alarmed the
government, which now regards every Internet user as a potential danger.
The use of Internet filtering is growing by the year and the most
repressive governments do not hesitate to jail bloggers. While China
still leads the "Internet black hole" ranking worldwide, deploying
considerabletechnical resources to control Internet users, Syria (159th) is the Middle-East champion in cyber-repression. Internet surveillance is so
thorough there that even the least criticism posted online is sooner or
later followed by arrest.

Only a few countries have risen significantly in the ranking. Lebanon
(66th), for example, has climbed back to a more logical position after
the end of the bomb attacks on influential journalists of recent years. Haiti
(73rd) continues its slow rise, as do Argentina (68th) and Maldives
(104th). But the democratic transition has halted in Mauritania (105th),
preventing it from continuing its rise, while the slender gains of the
past few years in Chad (133rd) and Sudan (135th) were swept away by the
overnight censorship.
Some African leaders have understood the advantages their countries could
derive from press freedom. Others have behaved like despots again this
year. The continent's best-placed countries continue by and large to be
the same, with Namibia (23rd), Mali (31st), Cape Verde (36th) and Mauritius
(47th) coming in the top 50. Some countries that were sorely tried by
years of war or dictatorship are emerging from the depths to which they were
plunged by violence. They include Liberia (51st), where some police
officers still behave with deplorable brutality, and Togo (53rd), which
is managing to adhere to acceptable democratic standards.

In democracies such as Botswana (66th) and Benin (70th), the climate
between the government and the press often deteriorates, preventing these
countries from attaining the positions they would otherwise deserve,
given their overall political situation.

Senegal (86th) has fallen again in the ranking because of the
government's stubborn refusal to amend the press law and the often outrageous behaviour of some of Dakar's newspapers. Senegalese journalists were imprisoned again this year. The bad surprise came from Mauritania (105th), where
legislativereforms were clearly inadequate and the political culture continues to be marked by former President Ould Taya's police-state practices.

There is no point in having a diverse and often insolent press unless you
tolerate it without resorting to the security forces or an easily
influenced legal system. In Central African Republic (85th), Burundi
(94th)and Guinea (99th), for example, the least political unrest can send
journalists to prison or at least the police station.

This year's black spots in Africa were Kenya (97th), which fell 19 places
as a result of post-electoral violence, and above all Niger (130th),
which fell 41 places after a very trying year for journalists in Niamey and
elsewhere. Reporting on the Tuareg uprising in the north of the country
has become an absolute taboo for the government, especially in the run-up to
the 2009 presidential election.

The African countries near the bottom of the ranking are also the same
ones as usual. They include Gambia (137th), Democratic Republic of Congo
(148th)and Zimbabwe (151st), where independent journalism requires courage,
determination and an ability to put up with violence and injustice.
Finally, the gigantic posters to the glory of President Teodoro Obiang
Nguema throughout "Africa's Kuwait" say it all about the media
situation in Equatorial Guinea (156th). But the continent's most abused country is yet again Eritrea (173rd), last in the ranking for the second year running.
President Issaias Afeworki clings to his deliberate choice of cruelty to
the many journalists held incommunicado since 2001, and despotism as his
method of governing a country whose citizens continue to flee into exile.